Book now with code EOY2025
JDMurray wrote: » I'm not sure what kind of scale I can use to express the difference. Maybe a comparison of an 8th-grade education to a Masters degree. The CISSP has a much greater degree of difficulty because it requires having a practical understanding of InfoSec concepts and not just the rote memorization of facts. There are also more concepts covered by the CISSP CBK than in the objectives of the Security+ cert. And the pencil-and-paper CISSP exam is a very long and grueling process, while the Security+ exam is pretty much like any other computer-based cert exam that you've taken.
abefroman wrote: » Does anyone know what percent of people pass the CISSP?
JDMurray wrote: » Many of the testing statistics of the (ISC)2 exams are not officially published, but I have heard speculation that the pass rate may be as high as 66-70%.
abefroman wrote: » That doesn't sound too too bad. I tried some of the practice questions from the Shon Harris book a lot of them seem rather easy, should I prepare for a lot harder questions on the actual test?
tpatt100 wrote: » The only thing I found hard about the CISSP was staying focused for so many questions.
UnixGuy wrote: » ... I want to take CISSP but I lack direct InfoSec experience, I'm wondering if it'll make my studying time very difficult.
JDMurray wrote: » Every InfoSec professional has problems studying for the CISSP exam because no InfoSec professional has significant experiences in all ten domains covered by the CISSP CBK. Therefore, having no InfoSec experience at all makes understanding the entire CISSP CBK all the more difficult.
veritas_libertas wrote: » @JDMurray: I thought you had to have InfoSec experience to be able to take the exam?
veritas_libertas wrote: » So I could take the exam and then later down the line just send in paperwork showing I meet all the requirements?
JDMurray wrote: » Anyone can take the CISSP (or SSCP) exam anytime and as many times as they want. To become fully CISSP-certified you must both pass the exam and have verifiable InfoSec work experience (and have an endorser...and pass the audit...and pay the money...).
abefroman wrote: » If my work is not strictly security do I qualify? I am responsible for securing about 100 linux servers, as well as setting the companies security policy and procedures, but I do tech support, sys admin stuff and some other things too. (I have been doing this for 8 years) Will I qualify?
abefroman wrote: » Whats the best way to get endorsed if I don't know another CISSP or SSCP?
Hyper-Me wrote: » If its all multiple choice then what is this "pencil and paper" bs?
kimanyd wrote: » They specifically state you need full-time experience in two of the ten domains. Some members here might be willing to endorse you, or you can apply directly to (ISC)2 if you can't find anyone.
abefroman wrote: » I think he means like a scantron test, rather than on a computer.
JDMurray wrote: » You've never taken a multiple choice using only pencil and paper? Then you're in for a treat! Yes, and a paper exam booklet too.
kimanyd wrote: » Probably early 2010 after I do CCNA:S and CEH later this year.
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!