Categories
Welcome Center
Education & Development
Cyber Security
Virtualization
General
Certification Preparation
Project Management
Posts
Groups
Training Resources
Infosec
IT & Security Bootcamps
Practice Exams
Security Awareness Training
About Us
Home
Certification Preparation
Cisco
CCST & CCNA (Entry-level & Associate)
Help with Dynamic Nat / Overload
bigheadx
Hello all;
Im doing a lab and got in a bind..
Here is what I currently have for NAT -
ip nat pool natpoolisp 192.168.100.11 192.168.100.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source list NAT pool natpoolisp overload
ip nat inside source static 10.10.0.1 192.168.100.1
ip classless
ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.252 192.168.1.6
ip route 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.6
ip route 172.16.15.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.6
Now my inside FA0/0 interface is 10.10.0.1..
I can ping FA0/0 from my local, 10.10.0.11 host, and it works fine. I can ping the inside global, and it works.
I can not ping 192.168.100.1 or 10.10.0.1 from outside the 10 network.
IE; I can not ping it from R2 which is connected to R1(Nat Router) via Frame Relay.
I have FA0/0 as Ip nat inside, and s0/1/0 as ip nat outside.
Any help is appreciated..
Find more posts tagged with
Comments
techimadhu
What do you have in your access list?
which interface have you marked as ip nat inside and ip nat outiside.
Also give the show ip interfaces brief of your nat router?
bigheadx
I have my FA0/0 on my ISP(Nat Router) as the IP NAT INSIDE,
and I have the S0/1/0 as the IP NAT OUTSIDE
ip access-list extended NAT
permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 10.10.0.1 YES manual up up
FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down
Serial0/1/0 192.168.1.5 YES manual up up
Serial0/1/1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down
Vlan1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down
bigheadx
My Topo looks like this
Host < -- > ISP(ROUTER) < -- > Sydney(Router) < -- >Auckland (ROUTER) < -- > Host |
Host
bigheadx
Nvm I figured it out :P
hermeszdata
bigheadx
wrote:
»
Nvm I figured it out :P
And what was the slution?
John
Quick Links
All Categories
Recent Posts
Activity
Unanswered
Groups
Best Of