nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

OSPF static redistribution

Eildor

I've noticed that when redistributing a static route via OSPF the parameters (metric-type, metric, subnets) can be entered in any order -- does the order have any impact on the redistribution process? I also noticed that when I look at the config the metric-type (E1/E2) isn't specified -- is there any particular reason for that?

Thank you

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

Eildor

Eildor wrote: »

I've noticed that when redistributing a static route via OSPF the parameters (metric-type, metric, subnets) can be entered in any order -- does the order have any impact on the redistribution process? I also noticed that when I look at the config the metric-type (E1/E2) isn't specified -- is there any particular reason for that?

Thank you

Oh wait actually I think I might know why... If I remember correctly type 2 is the default, so I guess if I were to change it to type 1 then perhaps I would see it in the config.

Eildor

Eildor wrote: »

Oh wait actually I think I might know why... If I remember correctly type 2 is the default, so I guess if I were to change it to type 1 then perhaps I would see it in the config.

Yup just tested it. Sorry about that