Question about CISSP endorsement
CORRECTION: Question about CISSP exam types
I talked to the folks at ISC2 regarding the test options.
There are two options for the CISSP exam.
1) CISSP EXAM
2)CISSP EXAM for ASSOCIATE OF ISC2
CISSP EXAM requires documented 5 years experience and allows nine months to obtain necessary experience to become certified before retest is required.
CISSP EXAM for ASSOCIATE OF ISC2 exam requires no experience and allows 6 years to obtain necessary experience to become certified before retest is required. Once endorsement is received and approved, title is granted.
SO, they said the exam is the same – and they rely on the endorser for experience verification. Which one in your opinion should I take?
I have about 81 months plus a degree of IS experience covering two or more domains within the CBK. SO experience isn't a problem. I currently have an endorsement by a member in good standing ready to be sent in once I pass - I'm just trying not to shoot myself in the foot. If the endorsement falls through and I take the regular CISSP exam, I only have 9 months to get endorsed. With the second test I have as much time as I need.
Opinions? I feel it is better to take the second test as that allows for more flexibility.
I talked to the folks at ISC2 regarding the test options.
There are two options for the CISSP exam.
1) CISSP EXAM
2)CISSP EXAM for ASSOCIATE OF ISC2
CISSP EXAM requires documented 5 years experience and allows nine months to obtain necessary experience to become certified before retest is required.
CISSP EXAM for ASSOCIATE OF ISC2 exam requires no experience and allows 6 years to obtain necessary experience to become certified before retest is required. Once endorsement is received and approved, title is granted.
SO, they said the exam is the same – and they rely on the endorser for experience verification. Which one in your opinion should I take?
I have about 81 months plus a degree of IS experience covering two or more domains within the CBK. SO experience isn't a problem. I currently have an endorsement by a member in good standing ready to be sent in once I pass - I'm just trying not to shoot myself in the foot. If the endorsement falls through and I take the regular CISSP exam, I only have 9 months to get endorsed. With the second test I have as much time as I need.
Opinions? I feel it is better to take the second test as that allows for more flexibility.
Comments
Boy that's new. I don't see anything on the website about a retake policy. I thought they would take your money at anytime for a retake.
The exams are identical. As an Associate of ISC2 you do not need endorsement. You need to earn experience within 6 years of passing the exam otherwise you have to take the exam again.
If you cannot find anyone to endorse you or you are not sure if this person would endorse you, I would suggest that ISC2 would assist you in this process. Normally it takes up to 6 weeks for endorsement.
If this just an issue of time and you do not think you are that familiar with the material and may be opposed to giving up additional $$$ to sit for another exam I would suggest that you reschedule for a later date.
Good Luck on the exam.
Regards and Happy New Year!!!
Thanks for the reply.
However, this question is not about retake policy. I should clarify. If you take the CISSP exam and do not have the endorsement within nine months of passing the exam, you must pay the exam fee and take the test again. Would it just be less stressful and a better option to take the second exam?
You have both the 5+ years of experience and an endorser, so you will go for the full CISSP certification. There is really nothing else to consider.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
Thanks for correcting me. I have been working a grest deal as of late.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray