PT1-002: CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Beta Exam
Just received an email for new beta.
Booked for May
Booked for May
I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
Comments
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
Select "PT1-002: CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Beta Exam" from the exam catalog.
2020: GCIP | GCIA
2021: GRID | GDSA | Pentest+
2022: GMON | GDAT
2023: GREM | GSE | GCFA
WGU BS IT-NA | SANS Grad Cert: PT&EH | SANS Grad Cert: ICS Security | SANS Grad Cert: Cyber Defense Ops | SANS Grad Cert: Incident Response
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
You just described a feature of the Cloud+ beta exam we all took last year.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
Anyway, looks like you can take the exam between now and the end of June. I signed up for a May exam date to give me about a month to prep and some buffer to re-schedule if necessary. We'll see how it goes.
You took the Cloud beta exam in 2016? We're talking about the Cloud+ beta exam given in 2020. Those results won't be released until June 2021.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
xx+ certs...and I'm not counting anymore
A little under three years have passed since I last took the CompTIA Pentest+ exam. Like last time, I took the beta-version of the exam. Just like last time, I decided to go into the exam completely blank, only taking a glance at the official objectives beforehand.
The OnVue at-home testing experience offered by PearsonVue, like always, was decent. The tooling works well enough, the proctor was communicative, waiting times weren't too bad. The software feels kind of intrusive, as to what it wants to do on your laptop, but at least it didn't want me to install anything, nor does it require admin-level rights.
As to the exam itself, my experiences mirror what I felt back in 2018:
- It feels like there's an over-reliance on NMap and its flags. The objectives state that 30% of your score comes from Attacks & Exploits, with a further 16% coming from Tools and Code Analysis. In my test, it felt like NMap-related questions made up 10-15% of the total question base. That doesn't sit right with me, but of course my impressions could be wrong.
- A very small amount of questions were not good, from a test-taker perspective. Some were overly wordy, with long run-on sentences. Others either had zero correct answers (due to syntax mistakes), or made little sense logically.
- The PBQs (performance based questions) were similar to last time, with the one I disliked the most making a re-appearance. It's one where you have to both categorize and remediate 7-10 vulnerabilities, where in some cases all responses are sub-optimal.
I feel that the PT1-002 exam needs some polishing and a few corrections, but overall the level of difficulty and the type of questions asked do in fact do a fairly good job at testing someone with 2-3 years of pentesting experience.I'm curious whether I've passed! As was said: I went in without preparation and there's definitely a number of objective areas where I don't have experience.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
While I may have been fully aware of what you explained, a few of the pieces didn't fit together yet. You're right! The fact that I got so many NMap questions may definitely mean they just want to weed out a (large) number of the questions that are sub-optimal.