This is called seriously failing an interview
DatabaseHead
Member Posts: 2,754 ■■■■■■■■■■
This cracks me up.
It would be interesting to see if they recouped any of the lost time in wages. It has to be very frustrating getting a candidate in who is not even close to the task.
Original Source
https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D22AQFX_3Fiode6hA/feedshare-shrink_8192/0?e=1549148400&v=beta&t=C_Zx7setYkmbKyUjro24zWhTP4Xv1Gq_qNJtCkbc4zE
Comments
-
PCTechLinc Member Posts: 646 ■■■■■■□□□□I guess the "fake it 'til you make it" didn't work in this case...
Master of Business Administration in Information Technology Management - Western Governors University
Master of Science in Information Security and Assurance - Western Governors University
Bachelor of Science in Network Administration - Western Governors University
Associate of Applied Science x4 - Heald College -
clarson Member Posts: 903 ■■■■□□□□□□Probably fictitious, but we all wish we could do that.
1) isn't that the purpose of your hiring process to find qualified candidates, and not just pick from the cream of the crop that 100% meets your requirements and then some?
2) makes me wonder who is more ignorant, the applicant or the three people who took 2 hours to "immediately" know the applicant was unqualified.
3) calling someone unqualified so harshly in writing over what could possibly be just a bad interview on applicant's part is a good way of losing more than just money. -
thomas_ Member Posts: 1,012 ■■■■■■■■□□I wonder if this is their core business model. Post a bunch of job application, don’t prescreen candidate well, and then send them an invoice. Somebody needs to find the company and do the exact same thing to them.