CCNA Study Group
Comments
-
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□I've updated my previous posts on last page with an answer and explanation, sorry for any confusion caused earlier.Getting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□Answer is 172.144.0.0/12.
The /16 is a typo. Think about it this way, you can't summarize 2 large subnets with a smaller one so that answer fails a quick sanity check. Question is a bit tricky since the IP addresses given are in the middle of the subnet.
172.148.0.0/13 = 172.144.0.0 - 172.151.255.255
172.156.0.0/13 = 172.152.0.0 - 172.159.255.255
Range to summarize is therefore 172.144.0.0 - 172.159.255.255.
Edit: Original logic didn't work for all cases.Getting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
anywho Member Posts: 13 ■□□□□□□□□□Going back to original question, my shortcut to avoid binary is this:
1. Determine "block size" by subtracting larger interesting octet from smaller one. "Block size" can only be a power of 2.
2. In this question, I have to use 16 because 8 won't include 172.156 network. So the network address given the range and block size is 172.144.0.0
3. To determine subnet, subtract "block size" from 256 (256-16=240). 240 goes in the interesting octet, so 255.240.0.0 = /12 -
cpartin Member Posts: 84 ■■□□□□□□□□Xnx, check your network boundaries. 172.148.0.0/12 doesn't cover 172.148.0.0 - 172.164.0.0, it's 172.144.0.0 - 172.159.255.255. See below how IOS auto corrects it.
R1(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.[B]148[/B].0.0 255.240.0.0 R1(config-if)#do show run int fast 0/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 138 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.[B]144[/B].0.0 255.240.0.0 5
Also I found this site to double check, I was starting to get confused lol.
http://asecuritysite.com/ip/routesum -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414I can pretty much do /16 and above without even thinking, but below that it gets a bit cloudy.
-
cpartin Member Posts: 84 ■■□□□□□□□□Anywho, that's exactly how I do it as well. One thing you have to keep in mind though is whether you cross network boundaries.
See the below summarizations. Both are contiguous /13s, but have different sized summaries. /13+/13 doesn't always equal /12 lol.
172.144.0.0/13 + 172.152.0.0/13 = 172.144.0.0/12
172.152.0.0/13 + 172.160.0.0/13 = 172.128.0.0/10 -
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□Xnx, check your network boundaries. 172.148.0.0/12 doesn't cover 172.148.0.0 - 172.164.0.0, it's 172.144.0.0 - 172.159.255.255. See below how IOS auto corrects it.
R1(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.[B]148[/B].0.0 255.248.0.0 R1(config-if)#do show run int fast 0/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 138 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.[B]144[/B].0.0 255.248.0.0 5
Also I found this site to double check, I was starting to get confused lol.
http://asecuritysite.com/ip/routesum
255=8
240 = 4Getting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
Jon_Cisco Member Posts: 1,772 ■■■■■■■■□□
Great set of posts. We might all be confused but that's how learning happens.
My guess is the original question had a typo in the answer that made us all start second guessing ourselves. I'm gonna try out that routesum link. Might be nice for checking my math.
@magic I thought I was going mad too and I'm thinking of testing next week! -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414Great set of posts. We might all be confused but that's how learning happens.
My guess is the original question had a typo in the answer that made us all start second guessing ourselves. I'm gonna try out that routesum link. Might be nice for checking my math.
@magic I thought I was going mad too and I'm thinking of testing next week!
Lol just be safe in the knowledge that there are no typos in the exam!
In fact mate you'd be surprised at how many typos/wrong terms are used in the learning materials. There were a couple in Odoms that really made me question my sanity and learning methods! -
cpartin Member Posts: 84 ■■□□□□□□□□You've entered a /13 mask here instead of a /12 in your IOS Config
255=8
240 = 4
Nice catch, I totally screwed that up. Same output though.R1(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.148.0.0 255.240.0.0 R1(config-if)#do show run int fast 0/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 138 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address ip summary-address eigrp 10 172.144.0.0 255.240.0.0 5
Long story short, don't feel bad everyone, this stuff is confusing lol. -
cpartin Member Posts: 84 ■■□□□□□□□□What I did for my CCNA prep was visit this site and drill for 10-15 min a day. Apparently I need to go back and practice some more!
subnettingquestions.com - Free Subnetting Questions and Answers Randomly Generated Online -
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□What I did for my CCNA prep was visit this site and drill for 10-15 min a day. Apparently I need to go back and practice some more!
subnettingquestions.com - Free Subnetting Questions and Answers Randomly Generated OnlineGetting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□Just realised my mistake in earlier post too, I couldn't add 16 to 144. *facepalm*Getting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
Agent47 Member Posts: 103Thank you all for your responses, glad this got everyone thinking . I'm going to go through and re-read them to see how I can apply your suggestions. I printed out all of the summaries and written labs from Lammle's book so I believe that question is from chapter 6. Will send another update once I get a little practice in.
ME when I finally figure out route summarization and ACL's:
Have a good day and thanks again! -
--chris-- Member Posts: 1,518 ■■■■■□□□□□Just finished Odoms chapter on sumerization. I am feeling very overwhelmed on the whole sumerization & VLSM subject. Is that something that I just need to practice more to get comfortable with?
-
davenull Member Posts: 173 ■■■□□□□□□□I was struggling with summarization and especially VLSM for a bit too.
For VLSM, the breakthrough came when I realized that different subnet masks basically define different block sizes, the "floor" and the "ceiling" of a subnet, but that the pool of addresses still remains the same. You are just cutting up the same pie in different size slices.
For summarization, I just imagine it in my head in binary, I'm going from left to right looking for the first bit that is different, then the bit before that defines the new mask. There might be an easier way, but it works for me so far. -
xnx Member Posts: 464 ■■■□□□□□□□I found summarisation slightly difficult too when I first learnt it, now I just think of the range of addresses that need to be summarised and the mask that'll allow an increment to go up to a network that both address ranges.
e.g 172.16.2.0
172.16.5.0
Lowest network is 172.16.0.0 and we need to go up in a increment of 8 on 3rd octet to cover the 172.16.5.0 network.
So 172.16.0.0/21 will go up in 8's on the 3rd octet and cover 172.16.0.0 to 172.16.7.0 but NOT the 172.16.8.0 network as that's the start of a new block.Getting There ...
Lab Equipment: Using Cisco CSRs and 4 Switches currently -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414Just finished EIGRP, now onto troubleshooting routing protocols! More than half way through now.
-
--chris-- Member Posts: 1,518 ■■■■■□□□□□I found summarisation slightly difficult too when I first learnt it, now I just think of the range of addresses that need to be summarised and the mask that'll allow an increment to go up to a network that both address ranges.
e.g 172.16.2.0
172.16.5.0
Lowest network is 172.16.0.0 and we need to go up in a increment of 8 on 3rd octet to cover the 172.16.5.0 network.
So 172.16.0.0/21 will go up in 8's on the 3rd octet and cover 172.16.0.0 to 172.16.7.0 but NOT the 172.16.8.0 network as that's the start of a new block.I was struggling with summarization and especially VLSM for a bit too.
For VLSM, the breakthrough came when I realized that different subnet masks basically define different block sizes, the "floor" and the "ceiling" of a subnet, but that the pool of addresses still remains the same. You are just cutting up the same pie in different size slices.
For summarization, I just imagine it in my head in binary, I'm going from left to right looking for the first bit that is different, then the bit before that defines the new mask. There might be an easier way, but it works for me so far.
Thanks, the both of ya. These ideas have helped me, quite a bit in fact. -
Jon_Cisco Member Posts: 1,772 ■■■■■■■■□□I scheduled my CCENT for this Friday.
For review I have been skimming Odems chapters for the last week (didn't have time to read the book) and taking a practice test each night.
I keep a list of terms I don't know or understand while testing and look up the topics at the end of the test.
My original learning was the Netacad and CBT Nuggets. -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414I scheduled my CCENT for this Friday.
For review I have been skimming Odems chapters for the last week (didn't have time to read the book) and taking a practice test each night.
I keep a list of terms I don't know or understand while testing and look up the topics at the end of the test.
My original learning was the Netacad and CBT Nuggets.
Good luck! -
ednard Member Posts: 75 ■■□□□□□□□□I miss studying for my CCNA Had to postpone it until I finish my second year at Uni, and I'm hoping to take my Composite in September, can't wait.
-
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414Feeling very overwhelmed with STP and EIGRP at the moment. I've not even hit WAN protocols yet (the part people say is the hardest!). Self doubt creeping in. Hopefully my new job kicks me back in to action.
-
--chris-- Member Posts: 1,518 ■■■■■□□□□□Magic Johnson wrote: »Feeling very overwhelmed with STP and EIGRP at the moment. I've not even hit WAN protocols yet (the part people say is the hardest!). Self doubt creeping in. Hopefully my new job kicks me back in to action.
I know the feeling. I have finished Lammles book and have two chapters left in Odoms book, yet feel very far away from being ready for the exam.
The one thing that has made me feel better is to realize my 12 month goal for CCNA is just a self imposed goal. I only disappoint myself if I don't get this done in 12 months, no one else. Its not like I lose my job if I don't get it in that time period. You see where I am going with this?
Once I take some pressure of myself and look at things again I feel renewed hope and the self doubt starts to go away because i know given enough time anyone can learn this stuff. -
--chris-- Member Posts: 1,518 ■■■■■□□□□□Question on NAT/PAT (more or less, am I right?):
Static NAT and Dynamic NAT require a 1:1 relationship of inside local address's to inside global addresses right? While PAT is the only translation technique that can do a Many:1? -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414Question on NAT/PAT (more or less, am I right?):
Static NAT and Dynamic NAT require a 1:1 relationship of inside local address's to inside global addresses right? While PAT is the only translation technique that can do a Many:1?
1-1 = 1 address to 1 host. I got confused a bit with Dynamic Nat thinking well there is multiple addresses so that must be many to 1 but no. 1 to Many = 1 public IP shared between many hosts. -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414I know the feeling. I have finished Lammles book and have two chapters left in Odoms book, yet feel very far away from being ready for the exam.
The one thing that has made me feel better is to realize my 12 month goal for CCNA is just a self imposed goal. I only disappoint myself if I don't get this done in 12 months, no one else. Its not like I lose my job if I don't get it in that time period. You see where I am going with this?
Once I take some pressure of myself and look at things again I feel renewed hope and the self doubt starts to go away because i know given enough time anyone can learn this stuff.
I planned to have my CCNA by the end of April. That's way out the window, don't even think I'll have it by May. I can make my target June, would be nice to be certified for my birthday.
I'm the same, it's a self-imposed deadline.
Really enjoying GNS3 at the moment though, it just 'feels' miles better than PT or Boson Netsim. -
Magic Johnson Member Posts: 414Magic Johnson wrote: »Really enjoying GNS3 at the moment though, it just 'feels' miles better than PT or Boson Netsim.
And sweet fate, with a cruel twist of her Valyrian steel knife, stabs me right in the back and breaks my base topology config that had taken me 4 hours this morning to set up.
ARGH.
EDIT: Ok fixed got my topology back (was stored on network instead of local, was causing errors) but I didn't copy my running configs over to startup and I didn't realise GNS3 doesn't save the running configs when you save the project! D'oh!!! -
jeffgibbs Member Posts: 25 ■□□□□□□□□□Magic Johnson wrote: »Feeling very overwhelmed with STP and EIGRP at the moment. I've not even hit WAN protocols yet (the part people say is the hardest!). Self doubt creeping in. Hopefully my new job kicks me back in to action.
I know how you feel I was really hoping to have finished CCNA up by the end of April. Now it looks like I wont be taking the test untill maybe the end of June. EIGRP threw me for a loop as well . I suppose that may be partly just lack of familiarity with it. I have worked professionally with OSPF so its had extra reinforcement in my brain, but never EIGRP.
I thought I understood STP untill the Per Vlan bridge election process was "explained to me" I understand it when I read it but looking at in in a network and everything gets kind of hazy. STP itself is simple. Its the sometmes complex networks we build that complicates it and makes your mind hurt. I am of course paraphraseing Jeremy for CBT Nuggets here.
I think the solution for me is probably more labs to reinforce the reading and videos. Hang in there. Remember it was by persistance that the snail made it to the Ark.
Jeff