Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
pcasesa wrote: » Hi all. I am happy to answer any questions you have about what is happening with the results.
Corrant wrote: » So will the results hit right at 5pm EST? Or will it be anytime tomorrow? Extremely frustrating experience.
ddeboer wrote: » Philip, Personally I wonder why the results of the candidates that took their exam between the 15th of April and the 21st of May are held so long? People who took their exam the 22nd or later got immediate results, so I would guess the psychometric analysis was done by then. Anyway, I hope for a result tomorrow. Preferably a positive one
johnpoon wrote: » Now instead of checking our email every 5 minutes, I'm sure that there are hoards of people checking Pearson Vue every 5 minutes for results. Regardless, looking forward to seeing some results!
renacido wrote: » It appears that this is exactly what is happening, a bunch of CISSP hopefuls are unintentionally DDoSing the Vue website.
gutbrodj wrote: » Phillip, Any updates from Pearson Vue? I know they said 5 PM CST, but this is really nail biting for me. I leave Sunday to take part in a CISSP-ISSMP boot camp/exam and originally I was expecting to be waiting on my acceptance letter at this point, not on my test results before going to this boot camp.
reaganhalf wrote: » Although the emails were made with the best of intentions, in hindsight they've made the situation worse instead of better for those awaiting results. In the meantime, others who took the exam after us are getting results and, if they passed, are moving forward in obtaining their endorsements and ultimately their certifications. Those who failed are getting the opportunity to get back to their studies and scheduling a retake. I would like to think that those of us who dared to take the exam within the first weeks of the new format deserve better and that something will be done to make up for it. After all, we did perform a service by doing so in helping develop the scoring for the exam for Pearson, ISC2 and future exam takers. I propose that for those of us who end up passing that our endorsement and certification process be expedited and moved to the front of the line ahead of those who are getting instant results and maybe our membership fee waived for next year. And for those of us who end up not passing that we get an exam voucher for a couple hundred dollars off the retake exam (and that would come out of Pearson's wallet of course).
renacido wrote: » When you outsource things to outside contractors, you don't get to outsource the blame when you fail to deliver to your customers as promised. Delivery of exam results from Pearson Vue to ISC2 on time should have damn sure been in an SLA. There is no excuse for either ISC2 or Pearson Vue. This is completely unacceptable.
gutbrodj wrote: » I need something to break right now, I am trying to hold my temper, but this is just so absolutely frustrating. Once I get my results 7 weeks late I can begin the attestation and endorsement which will take another 7 weeks. I have a facial tick that won't stop now, and I just want to move on, but I am just so angry. To see my manager every morning and have to answer the question "have you passed yet?" with "No, they still haven't release the results". It's getting to the point that he seems to not believe me any more. My job depends on this, and in the unlikely event that i failed, I needed to retake the exam already. But nope, I'm just stuck here in limbo, spinning my wheels, my manager losing faith in me that I am not as skilled and competent as I have said I am. I don't know whether to go to a bar get drunk and beat someone up, check myself into a mental hospital, or just curl up and cry until the results come out.
mtbjamin wrote: » I hope our tests were not lost. I hope we all won't have to retake the test. I feel like everyone who were part of the analysis should get a refund... Pass or Fail. As well as expedited endorsements/certification. Some of us have jobs that depend on these results.
pcasesa wrote: » Yes it is. And your comments are on point. But I will ask a general question, what makes you think there is not an SLA? Because it wasn't met?
gutbrodj wrote: » Me too, which I voiced to the member support in response to their latest email. Since we all work IT, we get those gut feelings that someone is pushing back because the lost the backup tape, or didn't check to make sure that the backups were actually working, or are covering their ass-ets because they royally screwed up and they can't fix the issue.
renacido wrote: » Failing to meet an SLA by a small margin is one thing. This is not a slight delay. And this is a failure to meet deadlines that have been repeatedly extended. Are you really surprised that we suspect a lack of oversight and assurance and management controls on ISC2's part? I appreciate your engaging with us and I believe you were confident in the timelines you gave us that were not met. I'm trying not to shoot the messenger. But this affects peoples' livelihoods. Imagine those required by DoD 8570 to obtain their IAT-III or IAM-II cert by such-and-such date or be terminated? Instead of getting the CISM which is equivalent under 8570 they chose CISSP. Imagine those who find out after all these delays that they failed? They should have had their exam feedback and been able to reinforce their weak areas and reschedule weeks ago. As your competitor at Offensive Security would say: "Try harder!"
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.