Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026
Pishof wrote: » Sorry to hear the new javascript exam course is giving you a hard time. Honestly, I'm not a fan of this course either, javascript just doesn't interest me and I never had a problem with .NET programming classes before. Did you take WFV1 first? That should have at least given you some foundations for html/xhtml you'll need to at least be familiar with for javascript. If the labs are giving you a hard time I strongly recommend making sure you at least open the completed lab files in Notepad++ (a godsend for this course that makes the code easier to follow) and going over the lab explanation in the book looking at the "answer" code. Even if you don't complete the labs yourself simply getting familiar at looking at the code in the labs and why it's the correct answer will help you with being familiar with the syntax. I see you're heavily studying the material and hope you're overestimated the exam. I haven't taken it yet but I think knowing the fundamentals and syntax of javascript should be sufficient. It's not as though you'll be required to write a final javascript project or anything like a brick/mortar college would require.
nhpr wrote: » The webcam exams are less fun than I was expecting. I thought there'd be some minimal interaction with my voyeur, but it's just the cold camera staring at you and the online test. The hardest part for me was keeping aware that someone was watching me, and reminding myself that I couldn't pick my nose. Once you accept that someone's (probably) watching you, it's no different than the preassessments.
erpadmin wrote: » If you haven't gotten uCertify, I highly suggest you do so. As Jack said, there are a number of items that aren't covered in the mcmcse.com guide (like a couple of the string objects).
petedude wrote: » See, wha'd I tell ya? uCertify rocks for CIW. It's like Transcender used to be for the MS exams.
ThePrimetimer wrote: » I did not take WFV1 as it was transferred. BOV1 was transferred in to, but my mentor thought it would be a good beginner class. I bounce back and forth about how I should not have them undo the course and just skip it. I am very excited about the other classes, Sec+, Windows 7, Windows server. I will definitely look into Notepad++, anything that will help me understand this better. Thanks!
Lemonade727 wrote: » Just looked at the new Student Portal layout since the change and noticed the gold medals for completed assessments in the "My Degree Plan" (formerly AAP) tab. Makes me feel like I did when I was in 1st grade and they had the giant board with everyone's name on it and gold medals indicating how well you behaved in class.
nhpr wrote: » Well, considering how my mentor seems to be operating on the misconception that I'm perpetually nine years old and sends me smiling, dancing cartoon computers whenever I do something well, this change may be indicative of WGU's overall perception of students.
demonfurbie wrote: » At this point in life you should know what works for your study habits
petedude wrote: » You'd be surprised how many people need that kind of coaching to get moving. I think the recent "satisfactory progress" changes to WGU's policies reflect that as well.
erpadmin wrote: » It's kind of moot though....the WGU Bachelors was only meant to be a marked checkbox in finishing a degree.
It excites me that I'm actually thinking about grad school....a few years ago, I'd have just been happy with a BS....I guess working at a university colored my thinking.
erpadmin wrote: » It's kind of moot though....the WGU Bachelors was only meant to be a marked checkbox in finishing a degree. It excites me that I'm actually thinking about grad school....a few years ago, I'd have just been happy with a BS....I guess working at a university colored my thinking.
petedude wrote: » Times, they are a changing. I had a real-estate agent tell me a few days ago that a bachelor's degree means nothing anymore. From a real-estate agent! I'm looking forward to a master's program, too, actually, even outside the "need to get it done" perspective.
bwcarty wrote: » Now that I'm at the university, I have a strong drive to continue my education in a graduate program. I took the GRE about a month ago, scored a combined 1410 (680 verbal, 730 quantitative), and I'm officially starting on my Master's degree in Applied Statistics this June.
erpadmin wrote: » To put it succinctly, 1D0-435, aka AKV1, is passed! Out of 50 questions, I needed 38 to pass. I passed with 39 questions. With this though, I will take that and love it! I can tell you that the mcmcse.com will help with a good number of questions....however, I don't recommend that that's the only thing you use. uCertify was very much more helpful in getting me the "win." However, I think the frames questions killed me...I didn't spend that much time on the Windows Object part of Javascript. Seriously though, these were the primary tools I used to pass this exam by the skin of my teeth (a pass is a pass!! ): 1. The newboston.com videos (the 40 videos, instead of the 27...though I stopped about halfway through it...after awhile, I couldn't take him anymore...) 2. JavaScript Tutorial (did not spend that much time on it...just tried to memorize what was needed). 3. uCertify (unlike Project+, I basically took 3 out of the 4 practice exams, plus studied there study guide, which was very helpful! Best $64 ever...) 4. mcmcse.com (not the most complete guide at all, as Jack2 stated earlier, but you get a great foundation) 5. Skillsoft (it actually helped a little though it was annoying to listen to). I am so glad it's over....if anyone is working on the 635 (like Pishof), you're gonna need to know do some scripting and spend serious time with it. If you're 435-ing it, you have until 5/31/2011 to do it. You will get your gimmes, but do not take the 435 lightly. Now gentlemen (and perhaps ladies...) I WILL be focusing on the MS exams...no more excuses this time. It is a Good Friday.
jmasterj206 wrote: » For those of you who have finished QLT1 how bad it is? Just wondering how long it took you. I am trying to schedule out the rest of my term.
demonfurbie wrote: » thanks for the info im starting akv1 in the morning
erpadmin wrote: » Best of luck, brother!
MiikeB wrote: » Anyone have any good ideas for the second paper on SST1? Social Scientific question? What kind of question are they looking for really? I wanna make sure whatever question I choose to write the paper on is valid before I get started on 5 pages. Would something like "Are children of abusive parents more likely to abuse their own children?" fit in to what they are looking for?
Lemonade727 wrote: » I struggled to get through all 40 of the newboston videos but I managed, and glad I did so I could learn the syntax for some of the array elements and how to integrate and pull info from forms
sheckler wrote: » I'm taking orc1 and mgc1 this weekend, any advice needed or are they pretty easy?
Exclusively for TechExam members. Applies to boot camps starting before April 30, 2026.