Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026
erpadmin wrote: » Oh wow, nice! Will you be attending the program for free at your university, OR will you go elsewhere? (Or...does your state still allow you to go to another state school for free as long as it's a state school...my university now will only cover "free tuition" for itself now..... ). Also, if you have anything you might want to add to my thread that I started yesterday about the GMAT preparation (I would imagine prepping for the GRE is similar), it'd be most appreciated.
apr911 wrote: » GUT1 is the second java course. Its called Object Oriented Design and Development. Ive looked at the task stream and its not exactly clear (to me at least) what all needs to be done individually and with a partner. Im planning on attending the "Getting Started" conference call tomorrow at 11:00 MST to hopefully clarify the who what and how. From what I can tell, this is the break down of the tasks: Task 1 - Create a program with a partner. Discuss the experience and complete a self-assessment and submit for grading. (Program not submitted) Task 2 - Create a program (solo - Program not submitted). Present your program to 2 attendees and have them review your presentation. Submit the attendees review for grading (Unclear if the attendees need to be WGU Students) Task 3 - Create 2 presentations on [FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]software design patterns. Present your presentation to 2 attendees and have them review your presentation. Submit the attendees review and your presentations for grading. (Unclear if attendees need to be WGU Students) Task 4 - Create a program that connects to a database. Document your program using UML. Create a program test plan. Submit the program, documentation and test plan for grading. So it seems only task 1 is really a partner activity. As I said, Im hoping to clarify tomorrow who needs to do the presentation reviews and what needs to be submitted for each task.[/FONT]
Jack2 wrote: » Anyone doing the MBA IT management track? Opinion so far?
erpadmin wrote: » The only thing I don't like about it is that it's not AACSB-accredited. The only reason I care about that is because I want to adjunct teach (though that's part of the reason.) There is a good amount of discussion on the MBA-IT track in the LinkedIn discussions on the WGU Alumni group. Personally though, even if I wasn't going to try to be an adjunct, I would still want to try for a B&M school (online or offline.) Only to prove to myself that I could handle that coursework...especially since most part-time MBA programs allow you to finish in 2-3 years. I can deal with that.
Jack2 wrote: » Is WGU working on this accreditation? Why would this impair your effort to adjunct teach?
erpadmin wrote: » From what I've read, colleges want to see aspiring professors graduate from a AACSB-accredited school if their going to teach in either a business program or even an IT program related to business.
petedude wrote: » Tenured full-time professors at large, well-known brick and mortar schools, yes. For smaller regional schools or online schools, I'm not sure this is always the case. For business adjunct professors, I'm hearing it's more helpful to have 18+ master's level credits in a specific concentration than anything else-- for example, an MBA in finance. I may consider this when I finally choose a program. There are a few options for NA master's degree holders that few know about. California state law permits holders of NA degrees to teach at the community college level, so there may be some options there. Some WGU mentors hold NA degrees as well. I'm also thinking there may be some shift in the market over coming years. If people start heading to college in droves due to the economy, we might end up in a short-term hiring bubble like tech companies were during the dot-com boom. In such a scenario, anyone breathing and holding a master's degree could get snapped up for a teaching job. This would only be for a short period, say 2-4 years, but it would be a fantastic window to get experience if it happens.
Pishof wrote: » I've been studying the new material and now that wgu finally has the online practice review/quiz/domain test/certification practice test up I've torn through all of those. I can consistently get 90%+ on their practice test question banks but I don't how the practice material is compared to the actual test. I'm guessing nobody else here has actually sat for the new exam yet? I feel like a guinea pig. I'd go ahead and sit the old exam but I doubt the new study guide will cover all the old material. I'm tired of javascript already.
erpadmin wrote: » I promise you, if the "online practice review/quiz/domain test/certification practice test" were available for me, I'd have taken the 635 instead of the 435. However, I just wasn't comfortable doing that. You might want to sit for the 635 since you have that resource. Adrian G. (the course mentor) is basically saying "trust me, all of the available resources you have are enough to pass the 635." He has to, since he's bragging away at helping develop the 635. What is the preassessment anyway? Is it from CIW?
Pishof wrote: » The only preassessment is the online practice tests from Certification Partners - WGU just like the WFV1 tests. That's why I don't exactly have the highest faith in them but I think I will go ahead and sit the 635 this week because that is the material I've been studying. I know for most exams the practice tests are often harder but I have a hard time believing that will be the case this time. I think the online wgu practice material was too simple.
erpadmin wrote: » If I had to READ all the material in WFV1, I'd have gotten 100%. There wasn't one question that was asked that wasn't covered in the books (from what I skimmed...) I'm sure the Javascript is the exact same way...however keep in mind that you're *supposed* to spend x amount of hours daily going through it like you would in a classroom. (As opposed to the cramming we tend to do, for the most part, just to get rid of the CIW exams...) If you're comfortable with Javascript and the new material, then knock that sucker out. Personally, there was only so much functions, methods, properties, document.write, frames etc, that I could take that I had to just hope that what I did was enough...
Lemonade727 wrote: » My mentor was a bit hesitant to approve my request though since it hasn't been too long since I enrolled in the course and I think that's relating to what you stated about how we're "supposed" to dedicate several weeks time (or however long the COS usually mentions it should take to pass the class).
jmasterj206 wrote: » Well I failed my first WGU assessment last night. GAC1 or finite mathematics. For those of you who have to take it not the easiest. The problem is that the test has few questions but has a high passing score. The highest I have run into. I so wish they would have let me take the old math classes. I wish the old they give you the answers would help out on this test but it really doesn't. This was probably the first test I ran into that the actual test was harder than the preassessment. <vent> It also didn't help that Kryterion decided to stop my test for no reason. I called in and they said we don't see a reason why it was stopped. </vent> Off to study more math that I will never use in my life.
Lemonade727 wrote: » I will be taking my remaining 3 math courses after these CIW certifications so I will be starting with the GAC1 probably in the middle of May. Are you normally pretty good at math, or do you struggle with it? I've always been pretty decent so was hoping these courses wouldn't give me too many problems (scored a 31 on my math portion of the ACT).
jmasterj206 wrote: » You are probably better than it than me, but I was a straight A math student in high school and college. The bigger problem for me is that I have been out of college for 8 years and high school longer. My biggest gripe is that there is no community for these classes. The course mentors are available of course, but it was nice to see where others had issues and how they dealt with them. I scored an 85 percent on the preassessment and a 60 on the actual test. Usually I am pretty close scorewise. I wouldn't worry about it too much I'm sure you will be fine.
Thxlbx wrote: » I am taking the Integrated Natural Science courses for my next term, starting next week. Anyone been through those?
JoshD779 wrote: » I took them in my second term. Those were my favorite gen ed classes. I also found them to be the easiest gen eds so far. The communities were very active and helpful too. I think I did the entire class in about a month. Don't let people's feedback about the exam freak you out. If you use the study guide provided by the course mentors, you'll do fine.
Pishof wrote: » So 42 is the answer! Tomorrow morning I'm taking the new JavaScript 1D0-635. Looks like I'll need a 42/55 to pass. A leeway of 13 answers should be more than enough for me to pass hopefully. The course mentor said that the online wgu practice exam is as close to the real test as you can get. Quite reassuring as the online practice test question bank isn't too hard. I wonder if it'll be friends with me.
Lemonade727 wrote: » Good luck! I'll be taking my JavaScript exam Saturday morning but for the 435 version.
Exclusively for TechExam members. Applies to boot camps starting before April 30, 2026.